38 Kan. App. 2d 245 - State v. Meza’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2021
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gunby · State v. Bryan · Bruch v. Kansas Department of Revenue · State v. Kesselring · In re Brock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hardly qualifies as garden-variety theft”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Identity theft is knowingly and with intent to defraud for economic benefit, obtaining, possessing, transferring, using or attempting to obtain, possess, transfer or use, one or more identification documents or personal identification number of another person other than that issued lawfully for the use of the possessor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had defendant not used [the victim's] name and social security number to obtain a job, she would not have been entitled to receive the wages and insurance benefits that flowed directly from her employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Campos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.