Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 WIS2D 582 - State v. Preston

State v. Preston’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 27 Wis. 2d 687 - City of Madison v. Geier · 21 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Horan · State v. Cannon · State v. Roggensack · In re O

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A disciplinary proceeding is brought as an original action in this court, and the function of the referee is that of a special master appointed to conduct a hearing under the jurisdiction of this court. While the recommendations of the referee are given consideration, we look to the record and transcript to determine whether the facts apparent therein warrant some form of discipline. To evidence revealed in the record, we apply what this court has referred to (Madison v. Geier (1965), 27 Wis. 2d 687 , 135 N. W. 2d 761 ) as the middle burden of proof.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.