¶1The factual allegations supporting the claim of ineffective counsel lack the specificity required to establish grounds for relief. See Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980); Potts v. State, 242 So.2d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. As to the second ground, challenging the state court’s jurisdiction to try appellant, the facts as stated are insufficient to overcome the conclusive presumption of state court jurisdiction. 40 U.S.C. § 255; People v. Sullivan, 151 Colo. 434, 378 P.2d 633 (1963); Dobbins v. State, 114 Ga.App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (1966); Kansas City v. Garner, 430 S.W.2d 630 (Kan.App.1968); State v. Dykes, 114 Ariz. 592, 562 P.2d 1090 (App.1977); United States v. Pate, 393 F.2d 44 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 890, 89 S.Ct. 209, 21 L.Ed.2d 160 (1968).
¶2AFFIRMED.