Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 384 SW2D 332 - Sipple v. Commonwealth

Sipple v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2009

4 state decisions

2019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moore v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * However, RCr 11.42 does not provide, expressly or by implication, for the review of any judgment other than the one or ones pursuant to which the movant is being held in custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.