State v. Anders’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weinstein v. Heyman · 258 So. 2d 24 - State v. Alvarez · 376 So. 2d 927 - State v. Schafer · 385 So. 2d 1160 - State v. Bacon · 277 So. 2d 543 - State v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the trial judge had determined to go forward with a “trial” for which the state was not prepared, and had ordered a jury or a witness sworn, refiling would have been precluded on double jeopardy grounds. While the state’s acquiescence to a dismissal instead should be viewed, therefore, as no more than a commendable effort to save the court’s time, the end result should not be different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.