Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Conn. App. 216 - Cameron v. Alander

39 Conn. App. 216 - Cameron v. Alander’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

2 district · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Alexander v. Choate · Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail · Lampl v. Four D Manufacturing Co. · Caldor, Inc. v. Heslin · Travelers Insurance v. Kulla

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he burden is on the plaintiff to establish that she has been discriminated against on the basis. . . [alleged]. Only after the plaintiff makes such a prima facie case does the burden shift to the defendant to establish some justification for the discriminatory treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 6624 - State v. State, No. Cv 95 57527 S (Dec. 16, 1996)
  2. “necessary element of a claim under. . . [the statute] is that the challenged regulation discriminate on the basis . . . [alleged].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 6624 - State v. State, No. Cv 95 57527 S (Dec. 16, 1996)
  3. “All services of every state agency shall be performed without discrimination based upon . . . sex . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 6624 - State v. State, No. Cv 95 57527 S (Dec. 16, 1996)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.