Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 U.S. 412

88 S. Ct. 1112

19 L. Ed. 2d 1272

Docket No. 1113.

McSurely v. Ratliff

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

March 18, 1968

Supreme Court of the United States · decided March 18, 1968

Relies on McSurely v. Ratliff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided March 18, 1968

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1986 · most notably Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, Kentucky (1982), Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan (1976)

18 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

250196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dan Jack Combs, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and Morton Stavis, for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.

¶2

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

/390/us/412 · .json · Public domain