Volume 390 — United States Reports

Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court decision interpreting the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution's self-incrimination clause. Haynes extended the Fifth Amendment protections elucidated in Marchetti v. United States.

Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (1968), is a United States Supreme Court decision which clarified the meaning and application of Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In a unanimous decision, the Court reversed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and held that an automobile owner's interest in a suit against his insurer did not make him an "indispensable party" to that suit under Rule 19. The Court also made clear that Supreme Court precedent predating the enactment of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure did not create any substantive right in non-parties to be joined in case, as the Court of Appeals had apparently thought.

Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which reaffirmed the law (as it then was) that fixing a maximum price was illegal per se. This rule was reversed in 1997 by State Oil Co. v. Khan, which held that maximum price-setting was not inherently anti-competitive and not always a violation of antitrust law, and should therefore be evaluated for legality under the rule of reason rather than a per se rule.

from pages 171-172 intentionally omitted] Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for appellant. E. William Henry, Memphis, Tenn., and Joseph J. O'Malley, Washington, D.C., for appellees. Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 In this case the United States appeals from a District Court decision 1 upholding the merger of Third National Bank in Nashville and Nashville Bank and Trust Company against challenge under § 7 of the Clayton Act.

Held: "We do not read the statute as authorizing disapproval of an agreement on the ground that it runs counter to antitrust principles . . . ." 122 U. S. App. D. C., at 64; 351 F. 2d, at 761 (opinion on first appeal).

from pages 261-262 intentionally omitted] Walter Herzfeld, New York City, and Richard A. Posner, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert N. Katz, Sol., Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., and Gary J. Torre, San Francisco, for respondents. Mr.

from pages 317-318 intentionally omitted] William H. Allen, Washington, D.C., for appellants. William A. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Missiouri, for appellees. Held: and the Commission sustained its assessment against the taxpayer's challenge. On judicial review, the Commission's decision was affirmed without opinion by the Circuit Court of Cole County, and then by the Supreme Court of Missouri.

Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968), is a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld an appeals court decision to forbid segregation of public prisons.

Held: 7 'Osborne Anderson, the defendant in error, although a full-blood Indian, was a citizen of the United States and of the state of Oklahoma.

from pages 377-379 intentionally omitted] Raymond J. Smith for petitioners. Sol. Gen. Erwin N. Griswold, for respondent. Mr.

Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968), is a 1968 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held per curiam that after a successful effort to obtain an injunction under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, attorney's fees under Section 204(b) are generally recoverable.

from pages 414-417 intentionally omitted] Irwin L. Langbein, West Palm Beach, Fla., for petitioner. David Ferber, Washington, D.C., for the United States. Held: 2,200 pages of testimony transcribed, and some 60 exhibits collected. Anderson's report from this investigation covers 40 pages in the original record.

Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968), is a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that local government districts had to be roughly equal in population.

Avco Corp. v. Machinists, 390 U.S. 557 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a suit for breach of a collective bargaining agreement can be removed to federal court under federal question jurisdiction.

United States v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 563 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case.

United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled part of the Federal Kidnapping Act unconstitutional.

Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that material that is not obscene may nonetheless be harmful for children, and its marketing may be regulated.

from pages 676-677 intentionally omitted] Louis Nizer, New York City, and Grover Hartt, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for appellants. N. Alex Bickley, Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Held: 'A cursory reading of the rule makes it evident that the word 'notice' refers to a notice to the debtor of his obligation and that the rule does not then further require a notice of an intent to execute, once notification of the judgment is properly given. Therefore whether or not [petitioner] had actual notice of the intended execution is immaterial. * * * Rule 53(a) * * * is clear in its terms.

Held: however, that the costs of such gas could not be greater, and must surely be smaller, than those incurred in the production of flowing gas-well gas.