Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 U.S. 456

88 S. Ct. 1194

Docket No. 700.

Anderson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

March 25, 1968

Supreme Court of the United States · decided March 25, 1968

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Biggers v. Neil

Relies on Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S. P. A. v. Lisi

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · 4–4 · Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided March 25, 1968

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Carriger v. Stewart (1997), Educational Testing Services v. Katzman (1986)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 16 state decisions

120196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J. Brad Reed, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner.

Ed R. Davies, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.

¶2

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

/390/us/456 · .json · Public domain