Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 F.2d 248 - Clinton William Baker v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Clinton William Baker v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

391 F.2d 248 · 1968

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 1970
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Carnley v. Cochran · Swenson v. Bosler · Seelig v. United States · Entsminger v. Iowa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * When a defendant whose indigency and desire to appeal are manifest does not have the services of his trial counsel on appeal, it simply cannot be inferred from defendant’s failure specifically to request appointment of appellate counsel that he has knowingly and intelligently waived his right to the appointment of appellate counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.