Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 F.3d 190 - In re Combustion Engineering, Inc.

In re Combustion Engineering, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

391 F.3d 190 · 2004

Citation profile

251
cited by 251 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 33 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 251 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey (2009), Chavarria v. Gonzalez (2006)

41 federal appellate · 33 district · 3 state decisions

1330200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1128 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 251 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “district courts `original and exclusive jurisdiction of all cases under title 11,' and `original but not exclusive jurisdiction of all civil proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under title 11.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]ankruptcy court jurisdiction potentially extends to four types of title 11 matters: (1) cases under title 11, (2) proceeding[s] arising under title 11, (3) proceedings arising in a case under title 11, and (4) proceedings related to a case under title 11.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the outcome of [the] proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.