Noyd v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
115 federal appellate · 72 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 517 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably Laird v. Tatum (1972), Schlesinger v. Councilman (1975)
115 federal appellate · 72 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedNoyd v. Bond (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 813 · 10 U.S.C. § 836 · 10 U.S.C. § 857 · 10 U.S.C. § 864 · 10 U.S.C. § 871 · 10 U.S.C. § 872 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Reid v. Covert · Phillips v. United States · United States Ex Rel. Toth v. Quarles · Hillsborough Tp Somerset County Nj v. Cromwell · Gusik v. Schilder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 517 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In reviewing military decisions, we must accommodate the demands of individual rights and the social order in a context which is far removed from those which we encounter in the ordinary run of civilian litigation, whether state or federal.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“. . . Congress, in the exercise of its power to 'make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,' has never given . . . [the Supreme] Court appellate jurisdiction to supervise the administration of criminal justice in the military. When after the Second World War, Congress became convinced of the need to assure direct civilian review over military justice, it deliberately chose to confide this power to a specialized Court of Military Appeals, so that disinterested civilian judges could gain over time a fully developed understanding of the distinctive problems and legal traditions of the Armed Forces.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[H]abeas corpus petitions from military prisoners should not be entertained by federal civilian courts until all available remedies within the military court system have been invoked in vain.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.