Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 SO2D 798 - Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 521 So. 2d 106 - Smith v. State (1988), 469 So. 2d 194 - Carter v. State (1985)

30 state decisions

1301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 362 So. 2d 10 - State v. Allen · 397 So. 2d 648 - Palmes v. State · Motley v. State · 389 So. 2d 250 - Kelly v. State · 119 So. 2d 400 - Bagley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where it clearly appears that the taking of property was consistent with honest conduct, as where the taker honestly believes that he or she has a right to property, the taker cannot be convicted of theft, even though the taker may have been mistaken.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In Bishop's Cr. Law, Vol. 2, Sec. 851, the rule as collated from the best authorities is thus given: `In all cases where one in good faith takes another's property under claim of title in himself, he is exempt from the charge of larceny, however puerile or mistaken the claim may in fact be. And the same is true where the taking is on behalf of another believed to be the true owner. Still, if the claim is dishonest, a mere pretense, it will not protect the taker.' (emphasis omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “incumbent upon the court to charge the jury on every defense which is recognized by the law and sustained by a version of the testimony which the jury has a right to accept.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.