397 So. 2d 237 - McDaniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2005
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Armstrong v. State · 46 Ala. App. 310 - Martin v. State · 54 Ala. App. 707 - Palmer v. State · 352 So. 2d 11 - Robinson v. State · Hall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Except as provided in section 12-12-72 and in subsection (e) of section 12-15-120 , all appeals from final judgments of the district court shall be to the circuit court for trial de novo. "An appellant shall not be entitled to a jury trial in circuit court unless it is demanded in the notice of appeal, and an appellee shall have no right to a jury trial unless written demand is filed in circuit court within 14 days of service upon him of notice of appeal."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Scott v. State · Stokley v. State“within his right to appeal the final decision of the Circuit Court to this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stokley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.