4 Binn. 344
Decided December 28, 1811
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1811-12-28
On the first day of this term, Biddle for the defendants obtained a rule upon the plaintiff to show cause why the proceedings in this suit, which was debt upon a bail bond, should not be discharged, and special bail entered in the original action. The original was brought to December term 1810; and the bail bond suit, to the present term.
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1819
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1811-12-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1directed the rule to be made absolute, upon the payment of costs in this suit, entering special bail, and giving the plaintiff a judgment in the original suit,
¶2[Cited in 2 S. & R. 285, 286 ; 5 id. 51.]
¶3 By the entry on the docket, the judgment does not appear to be one of the terms imposed; but it is otherwise upon the notes of the Chief Justice, and seems to be an essential part of the Court’s order.