¶1But the Court refused, and directed that the entry of the judgment of the Court be, “that the said Thomas Plumsell be precluded from any benefit under the act,” &c., according to the precedent in Walter Newton’s case, at April term, 1824. [2 Cranch, C. C. 467.]
¶2See the case of Keirll v. McIntire, at May term, 1826, [2 Cranch, C. C. 670,] and Fitzgerald's case, at this term, [post, 90.]