Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Edw. Ch. 598

Freeman v. Deming

New York Court of Chancery

Decided November 11, 1844

New York Court of Chancery · decided 1844-11-11

On a motion for an attachment for violating an injunction, it appeared that the working of the latter carried the enjoinment further than the prayer in the bill.

Decided 1844-11-11

The Vice-Chancellor, in the course of his opinion, observed :

¶1The language of the injunction differs from the prayer of the bill; but it is, nevertheless, to be understood as if it followed the prayer: and the defendants are to be enjoined no further than the bill requires.

¶2Mr. Dana, for the complainant.

¶3Mr. A. P. Mati, for the defendant.

/4/edwch/598 · .json · Public domain