Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 F.3d 986

Docket No. 93-6355.

Seagle v. Hamilton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 29, 1993. Decided: August 19, 1993.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Whisenant v. Yuam · United States of America v. Best

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-08-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.

Ralph Seagle, Appellant Pro Se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Ralph Seagle appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seagle v. Hamilton, No. CA-91-91-ST-C-MU (W.D.N.C. March 23, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Seagle's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)

/4/f3d/986 · .json · Public domain