16 U.S. 78
Supreme Court of the United States
February 11, 1818
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1818-02-07
This-cause was ordered to farther proof at the last term. Farther proof was produced at the present term and the cause submitted thereon without argument.
Cited in Case Law’s definition of “Change of property in prize (capture, pernoctation, infra praesidia)” · Case Law’s definition of “Recapture (proper sense)”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by John Marshall · Decided 1818-02-07
Cited by 6 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1941
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
THIS cause was ordered to farther proof at the last term. Farther proof was produced at the present term and the cause submitted thereon without argument.
Feb. 7th.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the decree of restitution in the court below, with a certificate of probable cause of seizure.
Decree affirmed.
Vide ante, Vol. II., p.9.