4 N.C. App. 534 - Thrasher v. Thrasher’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 184 N.C. App. 597 - Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris (2007), 157 N.C. App. 168 - Johnson v. Herbie's Place (2003)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Throckmorton · Sherrer v. Sherrer · Coe v. Coe · In Re Blalock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A collateral attack is one in which a plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded in the complaint unless the judgment in another action is adjudicated invalid.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In North Carolina perjury is held to be intrinsic fraud and ordinarily is not ground for equitable relief against a judgment resulting from it. . . . [A] party against whom a judgment has been rendered may be granted relief on the grounds of fraud provided the fraud practiced upon him prevented him from presenting all of his case to the court, but.. .judgment will not be set aside on the grounds of perjured testimony or for any other matter that was presented and considered in the judgment under attack.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The party at whose instance a judgment is rendered is not entitled, in a collateral proceeding, to contend that the judgment is invalid. Neither want of jurisdiction, defect of procedure, or any other ground of invalidity can be availed of collaterally, by the party who is responsible for the existence of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.