Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

4 Yeates 260

Moore v. Heiss

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1805

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1805-09-15

Motion to set aside inquisition of damages, finding for the plaintiff 574 dollars for the maintenance of a bastard child. Several objections were made thereto; but the one relied upon was, that there had been but four days notice given of the execution of the writ. In England, if the defendant lives within 40 computed miles from London, there must be eight days notice of inquiry, exclusive of the day it is given. 1 Tidd’s Pract. 319. And such is the practice of Pennsylvania.

Decided 1805-09-15

¶1But the prothonotary, and all the elder practitioners present at the bar, certifying that it had been the uniform practice to give to the defendant eight days notice of the execution of the writ of inquiry, except in foreign attachments, wherein the notice was put up in the prothonotary’s office; the inquisition was set aside by the court.

\Absente, Shippen, C. J. and Brackenridge, J.]

¶2A second inquisition was afterwards executed, finding for the plaintiff six cents damages, and six cents costs.

/4/yeates/260 · .json · Public domain