Livingston v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2014
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 24 Ala. App. 377 - Deaver v. State · 30 Ala. App. 226 - Rogers v. State · 39 Ala. App. 422 - Holmes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The question with which we are presented is whether or not in this state of the record we would be justified in disturbing the judgment of the lower court who saw and heard the witnesses testify and whose conclusion must be accorded a presumption of correctness. "Further, an additional presumption arises from the indictment. 'Where one is imprisoned by virtue of an indictment he is presumed to be guilty in the highest degree, and to be entitled to bail as of right, must overcome this presumption by proof. Rogers v. State , 30 Ala. App. 226 , 4 So.2d 266 ; Deaver v. State , 24 Ala. App. 377 , 135 So. 604 .' Holmes v. State , 39 Ala. App. 422 , 102 So.2d 673 ."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.