Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 324 - Celli v. Shoell

Celli v. Shoell’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 324 · 1994

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 19 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Randall v. United States (1996), United States of America Lance Hafter Do

16 federal appellate · 19 district · 3 state decisions

2001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 402 · 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 412 · 5 U.S.C. § 7120

Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Rodriguez v. New York · Sisson v. Ruby · Simopoulos v. Virginia · Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and the presumption is that they lack jurisdiction unless and until a plaintiff pleads sufficient facts to establish it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If jurisdiction is challenged, the burden is on the party claiming jurisdiction to show it by a preponderance of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “That definition requires, inter alia, that the organization exist”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.