State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1974
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Yost v. State · 109 So. 2d 422 - Hamilton v. State · Florida Motor Lines Corporation v. Barry · 59 So. 2d 529 - Seward v. State · Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In light of the fact that the trial judge instructed the jury to disregard his statement, it may be that we will be accused of being overly cautious in re-reversing defendant’s conviction. However, we agree with the Third District, which when faced with a similar situation in Robinson v. State, Fla. App. 1964, 161 So.2d 578, 579 , said: <*** Where there is simply a doubt, as here, that an accused has been prejudiced by a remark of the court, we must grant him. a new trial.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Karpinski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.