402 F. Supp. 2d 876 - Grier v. Goetz’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1315 (§ 1115 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396O (§ 1916 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396R (§ 1927 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala · Alexander v. Choate · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The bottom line is that Indiana has chosen to implement a utilization control procedure with regard to the optional dental services it covers which is fully authorized under 42 C.F.R. § 440.230 (d). That utilization control procedure is “sufficient in amount, duration, and scope to reasonably achieve its purpose” (i.e. covering dental services) for more than 99% of Indiana Medicaid recipients. 42 C.F.R. § 440.230 (b). As such, it complies with 42 C.F.R. § 440.230 (b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.