Feitz Estate’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably 1412 Spruce, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (1984), Wilcox v. Regester (1965)
7 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tahiti Bar, Inc. Liquor License Case · Cochrane v. Szpakowski · Kosco v. Hachmeister, Inc. · 138 Pa. Super. 251 - Spankard's Liquor License Case · In re Estate of Buck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the right to apply for such transfer is a right which possesses value,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““In Jaffe v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co., et al., 124 P. 1122, 1123 (Wash.) it was said: ‘The right to conduct the business is personal to the licensee, and does not pass upon his death to his administrators or assigns. But this is true only as between the state or the licensor and the licensee, and as to third persons when the statutes do not permit transfers from one person to another. “But where the statute recognizes the right of transfer from one to another, and where the right is a valuable right, capable of being surrendered and reduced to money, a different rule prevails. In such cases the license or right to do business becomes a valuable property right, subject to barter and sale. It is property with value and quality.” . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.