Stang v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. O'Connell · 298 So. 2d 376 - State v. Beamon · 260 So. 2d 878 - Lee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In essence, the state was allowed to allege one date in an information and bill of particulars, and then, after proving a different date, was allowed to amend the date to conform to the evidence. And the defendant, having in essence already advised six jurors that his only defense would be the state's inability to prove the date specified, was sent back out to face those same six jurors, his "defense" now obviously in shreds. The natural result was that he was convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Stang v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.