Allah v. Goord’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 50 U.S.C. § 521
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Haines v. Kerner · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Farmer v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court previously held that: The requirements for stating a claim under the ADA are virtually identical to those under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Stated in the ADA’s terms, a plaintiff is expected to show that (1) he or she is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) he or she is being excluded from participation in, or being denied the benefits of some service program, or activity by reason of his or her disability; and (3) the entity which provides the service, program or activity is a public entity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Masterson“the importance of resolving the question of qualified immunity at the earliest possible stage in litigation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.