Hall v. Oakley’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

cited by 19 later decisions

states following

October 2003

most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2003

19 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. City of Chicago · Government of the Virgin Islands v. Toto · United States v. Smith · Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“if a Florida Statute is patterned after a federal law on the same subject, it will take the same construction in the Florida courts as its prototype has been given in the federal courts”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Rivers v. State · 774 So. 2d 846 - Puryear v. State
“(1) A party may attack the credibility of any witness, including an accused, by evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime if the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which he was convicted, or if the crime involved dishonesty or false statement regardless of the punishment — ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Page · 447 So. 2d 1008 - Hamilton v. State
“Inasmuch as the right to testify on one's behalf is a fundamental right, ( see Moore v. State, [ 276 So.2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)]), we conclude against requiring that a defendant must testify in order to preserve his or her argument for appellate review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Raydo v. State · 713 So. 2d 996 - State v. Raydo

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.