Felix Sandoval v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 428th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Brooks v. State · King v. State · Highwarden v. State · Dinkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the “exciting event” should be startling enough to evoke a truly spontaneous reaction from the declarant; (2) the reaction to the startling event should be quick enough to avoid the possibility of fabrication; and (3) the resulting statement should be sufficiently “related to” the startling event, to. ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of that statement. McCarty, 257 S.W.3d at 241 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rule 404(b) is a rule of inclusion rather than exclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Donald v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.