Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 ILLAPP 500 - Kemp v. Freeman

Kemp v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
February 1948
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1948

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

70189119001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crabtree v. Kile · Owens v. Sturges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We warrant the animal to be sound and healthy and in every respect an average breeder, and, in case he fails to be an average breeder, we agree to take him back and replace him with another horse of equal value and merits,””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The transaction between the parties was an unconditional, absolute, and fully-completed sale, with a warranty of the seller superadded. Had there been no condition in the contract by which the appellants bound themselves to take the stallion back in case of a breach of the warranty, the appellee could only have kexDt the horse and sought damages for the breach. The clause by which the appellants agreed that the horse might be returned if there was a breach of the warranty only operated to give the appellee that privilege, which otherwise he would not have had.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.