42 P.3d
Volume 42 — Pacific Reporter, Third Series
73 opinions
- 42 P.3d 1Demers v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 19Burchett ex rel. Ezell v. South Denver Windustrial Co. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 23Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission (2002)
- 42 P.3d 29Wilcox v. Clark (2001)
- 42 P.3d 31Cottman v. Aurora Public Schools Board of Education (2000)
- 42 P.3d 34Schmidt v. Harken (2001)
- 42 P.3d 38Sylvester v. Liberty Life Insurance Co. (2001)
- 42 P.3d 41People v. Nix (2001)
- 42 P.3d 46Alexander v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado (2001)
- 42 P.3d 49Wilber v. Board of County Commissioners (2001)
- 42 P.3d 52Olson v. Hillside Community Church, S.B.C. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 57People v. Pauley (2001)
- 42 P.3d 61People v. Prophet (2001)
- 42 P.3d 63T.L. v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing (2001)
- 42 P.3d 68People v. Salas (2001)
- 42 P.3d 70Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. Roberts (2001)
- 42 P.3d 72City of Sterling v. Sterling Irrigation Co. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 75In Re the Marriage of Martin (2002)
- 42 P.3d 81In Re the Marriage of Schmidt (2002)
- 42 P.3d 82Moore v. City & County of Denver (2002)
- 42 P.3d 86People v. Vinson (2002)
- 42 P.3d 88People v. Stillman (2002)
- 42 P.3d 95People v. Posselius (2002)
- 42 P.3d 268Civil Serv. Comm'n v. Dist. Ct. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 293Keddington v. City of Bartlesville (2001)
- 42 P.3d 298Gregory v. Fransein (2001)
- 42 P.3d 300Dopp v. Oklahoma Local Bank (2002)
- 42 P.3d 303K.T. v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services (2002)
- 42 P.3d 310McKnight v. American Airlines, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 424In Re MD (2002)
- 42 P.3d 436State v. Perry (2002)
- 42 P.3d 440Sattler v. Northwest Tissue Center (2002)
- 42 P.3d 447Scanlon v. Witrak (2002)
- 42 P.3d 450State v. Hardesty (2002)
- 42 P.3d 456Moen v. Spokane City Police Dept. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 461Sweets v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division (2002)
- 42 P.3d 521Lake & Peninsula Borough v. Norquest Seafoods, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 525DeSalvo v. Bryant (2002)
- 42 P.3d 531Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 549Justice v. RMH Aero Logging, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 558McIntire v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 629Martini v. Smith (2002)
<bold>No. 00SC685</bold>, <bold><underline>Martini v. Smith</underline></bold> <bold>— Roadway — Vacation — De-annexation —</bold><bold>Abandonment — Dedication — Subdivision Plat — Disclaimer of Interest</bold>. In this case, the supreme court addresses a dispute concerning the ownership and permissible use of a platted road adjoining the plaintiffs' and the defendant's properties. The road was first dedicated to public use in a subdivision plat in 1955. The subdivision was, at that time, part of the Town of Palmer Lake. In 1964, the town de-annexed the subdivision containing the road. After this dispute arose, the county in which the road is situated disclaimed all right, title, and interest to the road. The trial court in this case found, as a matter of law, that upon de-annexation, the road "ceased existence as a public road" and title vested in plaintiffs as the abutting property owners. The court of appeals concluded that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Plaintiffs on the basis of the de-annexation. <underline>Martini</underline><underline>v. Smith</underline>, <cross_reference>18 P.3d 776</cross_reference>, <cross_reference>778</cross_reference> (Colo.App. 2000). Specifically, the court of appeals held that an ordinance purporting to de-annex a subdivision does not conclusively vacate the public roadways within the subdivision. That court remanded the case to the trial court to resolve the factual issue of whether the county has abandoned the road. Plaintiffs appealed and we granted certiorari. The supreme court now holds that a de-annexation ordinance, which does not include any language of vacation or language otherwise indicating that the city intended to vacate the public roadways, does not, by itself, vacate the public roadways in the de-annexed area. Rather, control of those roadways merely passes to the political subdivision in which the roadways are then located. Further, this court holds that, in the event the road has been used as a public roadway, the county's disclaimer of interest under C.R.C.P. 105(c) could not effect a vacation of the road because such a disclaimer would circumvent the provisions of the vacation statute. The court remands this case to the trial court for resolution of the remaining factual and legal issues.
- 42 P.3d 637SL GROUP, LLC v. Go West Industries, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 642Beauprez v. Avalos (2002)
- 42 P.3d 873Depew v. Depew (2001)
- 42 P.3d 952Detention of Petersen v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 968Wagg v. Estate of Dunham (2002)
- 42 P.3d 980Bort v. Parker (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1000State v. Khounvichai (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1047Fernau v. Rowdon (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1060Kessey v. Frontier Lodge, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1065Wollaston v. Schroeder Cutting, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1071Bell v. Precision Airmotive Corp. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1072Jourdan v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1083Shields v. Cape Fox Corp. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1093Hcs v. Capa (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1093H.C.S. v. Community Advocacy Project of Alaska, Inc. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1102Olmstead v. Ziegler (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1107Hamilton v. Hamilton (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1119SH v. State, DFYS (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1119S.H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1127P.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1127Pm v. State, Dept. of Hlth. & Soc. Servs. (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1137Carpentino v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1143Fitzgerald v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1147State v. Fortuny (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1152Blair v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1156Alvin v. State (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1240Selfridge v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund (2001)
- 42 P.3d 1258State v. Peterson (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1261State v. Smith (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1265INTERN. ASS'N OF FIRE FIGHTERS v. Everett (2002)
- 42 P.3d 1278State v. Bryant (2002)