43 P.3d
Volume 43 — Pacific Reporter, Third Series
78 opinions
- 43 P.3d 1State v. Rodgers (2002)
- 43 P.3d 4State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn (2002)
- 43 P.3d 23Kuest v. Regent Assisted Living, Inc. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 32State v. Rohrich (2002)
- 43 P.3d 38State v. Mora (2002)
- 43 P.3d 43City of College Place v. Staudenmaier (2002)
- 43 P.3d 50Hecker v. Cortinas (2002)
- 43 P.3d 53Chumbley v. Beckmann (2002)
- 43 P.3d 57Montlake Community v. Central Pugent Sound (2002)
- 43 P.3d 62Bolser v. Clark (2002)
- 43 P.3d 67RMC v. Coltran (2002)
- 43 P.3d 76State v. Grendahl (2002)
- 43 P.3d 121Central Wyoming Medical Laboratory, LLC v. Medical Testing Lab, Inc. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 140Magill v. Nelbro Packing Co. (2001)
- 43 P.3d 145R.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services (2002)
- 43 P.3d 145Rg v. State, Dhss, Dfys (2002)
- 43 P.3d 150Kinnard v. Kinnard (2002)
- 43 P.3d 157Snyder v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles (2002)
- 43 P.3d 162Kallstrom v. United States (2002)
- 43 P.3d 169State v. Zeciri (2002)
- 43 P.3d 221People v. Harris (2002)
No. 00SC185 — <underline>People v. Harris, — Rape Shield Statute — Hearsay —</underline><underline>Confrontation Clause</underline> After he was convicted of first degree sexual assault, defendant David E. Harris challenged the trial court's decision to exclude, under the rape shield statute, evidence of the victim's prior consensual sexual encounter. He argued that this evidence could explain the presence of a vaginal abrasion and would, inferentially, support his defense that his encounter with the victim was consensual. Harris also challenged the trial court's ruling allowing a police officer to testify about statements made by his former girlfriend. A divided court of appeals reversed the trial court's rulings, concluding that evidence of the victim's prior sexual contact could have explained her vaginal injury. It also held that the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay statements and that such error was not harmless. Accordingly, the court concluded that Harris's Confrontation Clause rights had been violated. The supreme court reverses and remands with directions. The trial court properly excluded the evidence of the victim's prior sexual relations under the rape shield statute. Given Harris's consent defense and his position that the abrasion could have been caused by consensual sex, the victim's prior consensual sexual conduct with another had no logical relevance to the case. The court also determines that the statements to which Harris objected were hearsay but concludes that the error in admitting them was harmless.<page_number>Page 222</page_number>
- 43 P.3d 412Dowdy v. Caswell (2002)
- 43 P.3d 414State v. Ramos (2000)
- 43 P.3d 417Henson Construction Co. v. Davis (2001)
- 43 P.3d 471Asarco Inc. v. Department of Ecology (2002)
- 43 P.3d 490State v. Barnes (2002)
- 43 P.3d 498Stansfield v. Douglas County (2002)
- 43 P.3d 502City of Spokane v. Marquette (2002)
- 43 P.3d 513State v. Duncan (2002)
- 43 P.3d 522State v. O'NEILL (2002)
- 43 P.3d 526State v. Summers (2002)
- 43 P.3d 526Burg v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 535Pacheco v. Ames (2002)
- 43 P.3d 539Comaroto v. PIERCE CTY. MEO (2002)
- 43 P.3d 548ROCKETTS v. State Bd. of Accountancy (2002)
- 43 P.3d 588Alaska Railroad v. Native Village of Eklutna (2002)
- 43 P.3d 611Ramirez v. People (2001)
<bold>No. 99SC814</bold>, <bold><underline>Ramirez v. People</underline></bold>. By operation of law, the decision of the court of appeals, <cross_reference>997 P.2d 1200</cross_reference> (Colo.App. 1999), is affirmed by an equally divided court. <underline>See</underline> C.A.R. 35(e).
- 43 P.3d 611Horton v. Suthers (2002)
- 43 P.3d 622Robertson v. Westminster Mall Co. (2001)
- 43 P.3d 629People v. Lunsford (2001)
- 43 P.3d 632People Ex Rel. Ard (2001)
- 43 P.3d 637University Park Care Center v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office (2001)
- 43 P.3d 641People v. Rodriguez (2001)
- 43 P.3d 644People v. Reed (2001)
- 43 P.3d 647People v. Slusher (2001)
- 43 P.3d 652People v. Forsythe (2001)
- 43 P.3d 655Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 660People v. Luther (2002)
- 43 P.3d 663People v. Caldwell (2001)
- 43 P.3d 673People in Interest of Jam (2001)
- 43 P.3d 676Holliday v. Regional Transportation District (2001)
- 43 P.3d 689People v. Allen (2001)
- 43 P.3d 693People v. Shepherd (2001)
- 43 P.3d 701Turkey Creek Ltd. Liability Co. v. Anglo America Consolidated Corp. (2001)
- 43 P.3d 705People v. Ferguson (2001)
- 43 P.3d 712Merrick v. Burns, Wall, Smith & Mueller, P.C. (2001)
- 43 P.3d 715Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Schroeder (2001)
- 43 P.3d 718Colorado Homes, Ltd. v. Loerch-Wilson (2001)
- 43 P.3d 725Woollems v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office (2001)
- 43 P.3d 726People v. Rios (2001)
- 43 P.3d 734In Re the Marriage of Talbott (2002)
- 43 P.3d 737Mid Century Insurance Co. v. Gates Rubber Co. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 740In Re the Marriage of Stewart (2002)
- 43 P.3d 743Combs v. Nowak (2002)
- 43 P.3d 745Winterhawk Outfitters, Inc. v. Office of Outfitters Registration (2002)
- 43 P.3d 750May v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2002)
- 43 P.3d 998Kirkpatrick v. Dist. Ct. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1223Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 12331515-1519 LAKEVIEW v. Apartment Sales Corp. (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1240Howe v. Douglas County (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1250Miller v. City of Bainbridge Island (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1258In Re Marriage of Ricketts (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1264State v. Floreck (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1268Plein v. Lakey (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1273In Re JW (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1277Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. Dickie (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1284Leanderson v. FARMERS INS. OF WASHINGTON (2002)
- 43 P.3d 1288State v. Locati (2002)