Mendez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 104th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Arizona v. Fulminante · Cain v. State · Ibarra v. State · Dezelle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court of Criminal Appeals has recently held that, `[e]xcept for complaints involving fundamental constitutional systemic requirements ..., all other complaints ... are waived by failure to comply with Rule 33.1.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mendez v. State“Even if we assume that, under the record in this case, the trial court should have withdrawn appellant's guilty plea on its own motion, the inquiry does not end.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mendez v. State“We note that this very issue has been decided recently by the Waco Court of Appeals in Williams v. State, 10 S.W.3d 788 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, pet'n ref'd)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mendez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.