Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 WASHAPP 482 - State v. Green

State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 45 - State v. Hehman · 69 Wash. 2d 744 - State v. Doolittle · 41 Wash. App. 758 - State v. Eugene W. · State v. Alberg · 66 Wash. 2d 732 - Town of Orting v. Rucshner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, she argues that the court assumes no jurisdiction based upon the citation unless there is a valid arrest. Specifically, JCrR 2.01(b)(1) stated: Whenever a person is arrested for a violation of law which is punishable as a misdemeanor . . . the arresting officer, or any other authorized peace officer, may serve upon the arrested person a citation and notice to appear in court, in lieu of continued custody. (Italics ours.) We disagree with Ms. Lopez' interpretation of the rule. The fact that the procedural rule refers to a person who is issued a citation as being”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.