Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

424 Pa. 650

Commonwealth v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Argued November 22, 1966.

Decided March 21, 1967.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1967-03-21

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Commonwealth v. Jefferson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-03-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2005

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

6019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

¶2David Kanner, with him Donald F. Copeland, and Kanner, Stein and Feinberg, for appellant.

¶3Alan J. Davis, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert M. Borden, Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

¶4OPINION PER CURIAM, March 21, 1967:

¶5Judgment affirmed.

¶6DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN:

¶7The trial in this case occurred in September 1965. Over objection, a confession given by Bennett to the police was permitted to be introduced in evidence, although, admittedly, at the time it was obtained he was not forewarned of his right to remain silent. This requires the grant of a new trial. See Commonwealth v.*651Jefferson, 423 Pa. 541, 226 A. 2d 765 (1967). The fact that Bennett may have been aware of his rights in this regard is not controlling. See, Miranda v. Arizona,384 U.S. 436, 468-69, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 1625 (1966).

¶8I dissent.

¶9Mr. Justice ROBERTS joins in this dissenting opinion.

/424/pa/650 · .json · Public domain