Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 Pa. Super. 527 - Commonwealth v. Proctor

425 Pa. Super. 527 - Commonwealth v. Proctor’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 447 Pa. Super. 222 - Commonwealth v. Woodruff (1995), Commonwealth v. Montini (1998)

26 state decisions

1201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Griscavage · Commonwealth v. Jarman · Commonwealth v. Modaffare · 381 Pa. Super. 606 - Commonwealth v. Hunter · 397 Pa. Super. 507 - Commonwealth v. Owen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases where test results show levels of alcohol significantly above 0.10% and where blood samples have been obtained soon after suspects have been stopped, there is a very strong inference that blood alcohol levels were in the prohibited range while driving. However, ... where the blood alcohol test result barely exceeded the 0.10% level and the lapse of time between driving and the taking of the blood sample was not insignificant, the inference is weakened.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The crime of driving under the influence can be committed not only by a person who drives, but also by one who “operates” or is “in actual physical control of the movement” of a vehicle. A person does not drive unless he actually has the vehicle in motion, however, a person may operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a standing vehicle. These terms are more comprehensive than the term drive. (They cover certain situations where a person under the influence is a threat to public safety even though he is not driving at the time.) Thus a person operates a vehicle if he is in actual physical control of either the machinery of the motor vehicle or the movement of the vehicle itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he entire width between property lines or other boundary lines of every way or place of which any part is open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel as a matter of right or custom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.