Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 SW2D 825 - Hoskins v. State

Hoskins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Dinnery v. State (1980), Flowers v. State (1996)

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

250196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dezelle v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 570 - Miller v. State · 159 Tex. Crim. 520 - Dunn v. State · Haynes v. United States · 162 Tex. Crim. 52 - Gossett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““With reference to appellant’s claim of deprivation of federal constitutional due process, attention is directed to Bee v. Beto, 384 F.2d 925 [CA5 1967], wherein the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a guilty plea entered by a Texas state defendant was conclusive as to the defendant’s guilt, admitted all facts charged in the indictment and waived all nonjurisdiction defects, citing White v. Beto, 367 F.2d 557 [CA5 1966]; Law v. Beto, 370 F.2d 369 [CA5 1966] and Haynes v. United States, 372 F.2d 651 [CA5 1967].””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right of the defendant to appeal for a review of the conviction and punishment, as provided by law, shall be accorded the defendant at the time he is placed on community supervision. When he is notified that his community supervision is revoked for violation of the conditions of community supervision and he is called on to serve a sentence in a jail or in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, he may appeal the revocation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is different from the rule in federal courts and many other jurisdictions,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.