Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 F. Supp. 97 - Dodson v. Parham

427 F. Supp. 97 - Dodson v. Parham’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2011

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Perry v. Sindermann · Dandridge v. Williams · The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Georgia has historically administered its prescription drug program on the basis of a drug `formulary' or, in other words, a restricted list of drugs for which Medicaid will reimburse provider pharmacists. Thus, any drug not specifically included on the list will not be reimbursed unless prior approval is granted by [the administrator of Georgia Medicaid program]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fatal flaws in the proposed program lie not so much in the drugs listed, but rather in the absence of what this court considers to be a medically sound and effective prior approval system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “expressly recognizes financial matters as relevant considerations in fashioning Medicaid programs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.