Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 F.2d 1 - Gittlemacker v. Prasse

Gittlemacker v. Prasse’s Empirical Analysis

428 F.2d 1 · 1970

Citation profile

248
cited by 248 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

103 federal appellate · 23 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 248 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Estelle v. Gamble (1976), Wright v. Collins (1985)

103 federal appellate · 23 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1760197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette · Robinson v. State of California · Price v. Johnston · School District of Abington Township Pennsylvania v. Schempp J Murray III · Everson v. Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 248 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the case of a prisoner, the determination of what constitutes an actionable claim may become difficult since imprisonment unavoidably results in the forfeiture of certain rights and privileges commonly exercised in a free society.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] negations of improper medical treatment by prison officials did not assert “a denial of rights secured by the federal Constitution of laws.” [and] an allegation of negligent conduct by a state public official is not sufficient, in and of itself, to bring a claim within section 1983. More is needed than a naked averment that a tort was committed under the color of state law; the wrongdoing must amount to a deprivation of a right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution and the laws of the United States It is only where an inmate’s complaint of improper or inadequate medical treatment depicts conduct so cruel or unusual as to approach a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of such punishment that a colorable constitutional claim is presented.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[To] . . . suggest that the Free Exercise Clause demands that the state not only furnish the opportunity to practice, but also supply the clergyman, is a concept that dangerously approaches the jealously guarded frontiers of the Establishment Clause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.