Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 NW2D 242 - Wangen v. Knudson

Wangen v. Knudson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2006 · most notably Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. Miller (1995), Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. Weathersby (1992)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

230198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ruane v. Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, actual or presumed, or in any case of wrongful injury to animals, being subjects of property, committed intentionally or by willful and wanton misconduct, in disregard of humanity, the jury, in addition to the actual damage, may give damages for the sake of example, and by way of punishing the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “For the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this code, is the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.