United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
429 F.2d 1344 · 1970
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 5005 · 18 U.S.C. § 5010
Relies on J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States · American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Lichter v. United States · United States v. Turley · United States v. Ragen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress clearly felt that the broad discretion thus vested in the sentencing judge was integral to the effective disposition of the post-conviction treatment of offenders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.