Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 N.E.2d 756 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2007

14 state decisions

90198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dipert v. State · Debose v. State · Wise v. State · State v. Palmer · State v. Sierp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “''The thirty (80) year enhancement brought about by the habitual offender statute cannot be invoked unless there is, in fact, a prior unrelated felony convietion. The trial court apparently erred in its belief that the finding that appellee was an habitual offender was a finding of a separate felony. This is not the case. The appellee was convicted of a felony and was a person with a prior unrelated felony conviction. Under [IC 35-50-2-2], the trial court had no authority to suspend the sentence. We hold that when a criminal defendant receives an enhanced sentence under the habitual offender statute, such sentence may not be suspended."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.