434 So. 2d 849 - Killough v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Although we affirm appellant's conviction and find that the trial court committed no error in ordering restitution in an amount exceeding that specified in the indictment, we must remand this cause for a determination of whether the $14, 936 claimed as expenses was properly included as restitution. There is no clear indication in the record as to who incurred these expenses. If these expenses were incurred by the State and amounted to investigation expenses they could not properly be included as restitution. United States v. Vaughn , 636 F.2d 921 (4th Cir. 1980)."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 434 So. 2d 852 - Ex Parte Killough

2. “[i]f appellant wishes to avoid payment of full restitution, her alternative is to serve the five-year prison sentence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 434 So. 2d 852 - Ex Parte Killough

3. “a defendant can agree to pay a larger amount in restitution as part of a plea bargain agreement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 434 So. 2d 852 - Ex Parte Killough