Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

435 F.2d 872

Docket No. 96.

Docket Docket 34674.

United States v. Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued October 8, 1970.

Decided December 1, 1970.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-12-01

4 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Certain Space in the Property

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1970-12-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2003

5 federal appellate ·

501970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

John B. Carroll, Syracuse, N. Y. (Nottingham, Carroll, Paltz, Coughlin & Conan and Adolph H. Huttar, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellants Walter J. Sampson, Bernard Greenbaum, Abner J. Mesirow and Walter A. Bogeaus, d/b/a Southeastern Industrial Dist.

¶2

William L. Allen, Jr., Syracuse, N. Y. (Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee City Investing Co.

¶3

Dirk D. Snel, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., James M. Sullivan, Jr., U. S. Atty., Samuel T. Betts, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., and Raymond N. Zagone, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.

¶4

Melvin & Melvin, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief for Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States, defendant-appellee.

¶5

Before MOORE, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶6

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Port's opinion. 320 F.Supp. 492 (1969).

/435/f2d/872 · .json · Public domain