Nation v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · German v. State · Fitzgerald v. State · Russell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““THE COURT: But you seriously believe that you would rather proceed Pro Se? That you would rather represent yourself? “MR. NATION: The man told me that he didn’t honestly think that he could help me out. And, therefore, I don’t feel as though I should pay him. Therefore, I don’t feel as though he should represent me.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nation v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.