Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 F. 358

Pearson v. The Alsalfa

South Carolina District Court

Decided December 14, 1890.)

South Carolina District Court · decided 1890-12-14

<p>Warrant or Arrest — Issuance on Sunday.</p> <p>A warrant of arrest may issue in admiralty on Sunday, where a vessel has changed her day for sailing, and proposes to sail on that day, and a libelant for seaman’s wages did not learn that his wages would not be paid in time to begin his case before that day.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1928

1 district ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on The Philadelphia Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company v. The Philadelphia and Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Company

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-12-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Warrant or Arrest — Issuance on Sunday.

¶2A warrant of arrest may issue in admiralty on Sunday, where a vessel has changed her day for sailing, and proposes to sail on that day, and a libelant for seaman’s wages did not learn that his wages would not be paid in time to begin his case before that day.

¶3In Admiralty.

¶4O. B. Northrop, for libelant.

¶5Simonton, J.

¶6The libel is for seaman’s wages. Libelant moves for a warrant of arrest, as the vessel is about to proceed to sea. The only question is, can such a warrant b.e issued on Sunday? The law of South Carolina forbids the service of civil process on Sunday. This regulation is purely municipal, and can control only the process in the state courts. If it can be construed to apply to process on the law side of the courts of the United States, under section 914, Rev. St., it cannot be made to apply to process out of the court of admiralty, which is expressly excepted from this section. The question now made is entirely new. There are no authorities in point, and very few bear on the question. Mr. Desty, in his little book on Shipping & Admiralty, § 181, says that Sunday is not recognized by the maritime law. Although the authorities he quotes do not bear him out in this broad statement, (The Richard Matt, 1 Biss. 440; Johnson v. The Cyane, 1 Sawy. 150,) it seems to have. support. Sailors pan be made to work on Sunday notwithstanding that a law of the port may forbid it. Ulary v. The Washington, *359Crabbe, 208. A vessel can leave a port on Sunday, although the law of the port may forbid travel on that day. Grier, J., in Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. v. Philadelphia, etc., Tow-Boat Co., 23 How. 209.

¶7This court is always open for the redress of wrongs. Seamen specially are under its protection. In the present case the vessel has unexpectedly changed her day for sailing, and has anticipated it by proposing to sail to-day. The libelant did not learn that his wages would not be paid in time to begin his case before to-day. In this view of the case, and in the absence of authority to the contrary, let the warrant of arrest issue.

/44/f1d/358 · .json · Public domain