Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
442 F.3d 1112 · 2006
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 14 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2011), Stallings v. Hussmann Corp. (2006)
43 federal appellate · 14 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff may show ... 'that a [prohibited] reason more likely motivated the employer.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirming). Rodgers v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 417 F.3d 845, 850 (8th Cir.2005) (”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An inference of a causal connection between [protected conduct] and [an adverse employment action] can be drawn from the timing of the two events, but in general more than a temporal connection is required to present a genuine factual issue on retaliation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Corwin · Thomas v. Corwin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.