United States ex rel. Fram Corp. v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.2d 611 · 1971
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross (1976), Stevenson Co Inc v. Bags of Flour Adm Milling Co Inc (1980)
9 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Scalza v. United States · Smith v. Crouse · Michigan v. Ohio · Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inconsistent with the seller's ownership”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(3) Where a tender has been accepted (a) the buyer must within a reasonable time after he discovers or should have discovered any breach notify the seller of breach or be barred from any remedy .... (4) The burden is on the buyer to establish any breach with respect to the goods accepted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A buyer who has accepted goods may under certain conditions revoke his acceptance. Georgia UCC § 2-608. However, once Crawford had accepted and installed the units supplied in place on the Albany site, any subsequent attempt at revocation was ineffective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.