Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

448 F.2d 783

Docket No. 71-2209.

Small v. Clark

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-09-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1972

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America · Kimbrough v. Beto · Williams v. Stire

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1448 F.2d 783

¶2William Frank SMALL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
J. J. CLARK, Warden, et al., Respondent-Appellee.

¶3No. 71-2209.

¶4United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

¶5Sept. 28, 1971.

¶6William Frank Small, Jr., pro se.

¶7John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Charles A. Pannell, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

¶8Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

¶9PER CURIAM:

¶10Affirmed.1a See Local Rule 21.2

¶111a It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

¶12 See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F. 2d 966

/448/f2d/783 · .json · Public domain